Why a Crypto Reserve Would Be a Government-Backed Grift

In an opinion piece by James Surowiecki for The Atlantic, he criticizes Donald Trump’s proposal of creating a crypto reserve through government funds. He highlights several concerns surrounding such a move:

1. Economic pointlessness and potential dollar weakening – Crypto assets were designed as alternatives to fiat currencies like the US dollar; investing in them would not strengthen it but rather raise doubts about its value stability.
2. Reallocation of funds – Acquiring crypto assets will divert resources from other pressing needs such as reducing budget deficits or funding government programs.
3. Corruption risks and conflicts of interest – A federal involvement in cryptocurrency markets could create significant incentives for individuals to influence policies favorably, especially considering Trump’s personal stake in the memecoin $TRUMP.
4. Transformation from revolutionary alternatives into speculative vehicles – The shift towards treating crypto as a means for financial gain rather than an innovative solution challenges its initial purpose and principles.
5. Institutionalizing government support for volatile assets – Committing taxpayers’ money to unpredictable investments would expose the US government to potential losses while providing little tangible benefits in return.
6. Damaging credibility as a debt issuer and creditor of last resort – The proposed crypto reserve could negatively impact investor confidence due to increased risks associated with dealing with an institution involved in speculative markets.

Overall, Surowiecki warns against embracing such proposals without considering the potential consequences on both economic stability and ethical standards within governance structures worldwide.

Support for this project was provided by The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

Complete Article after the Jump: Here!